I left the story of the molecule below on the precipice of a cliff. I had shaved off the four benzo groups (blue) in the time honoured computational tradition of clearing away distractions. Unfortunately, it became clear as the story unfolded that the benzo groups had a distractingly critical role to play, and so its time to start adding them back again, but in stages.
A feature of many a classic review article is that not only does it organise and rationalise existing literature, but it will predict new chemistry as well. I have already noted Woodward and Hoffmann’s (WH) review as achieving the former, and here I take a (sideways) look at one of their predictions.
The previous post showed how the 2+2 cycloaddition of an alkene could occur by a sort of sideways insinuation of the bonds. I have also shown how the same reaction can occur with a dramatic rotation of one of the double bonds. This post compares the two moves side by side. 0.0 5.3 kcal/mol The forbidden dance The allowed dance. As is sometimes the case in real life, the forbidden option has the lower activation barrier!
In this earlier post, I described how the stereochemistry of π2+π2 cycloadditions occurs suprafacially if induced by light, and how one antarafacial component appears if the reaction is induced by heat alone.
There are many treasures in Woodward and Hoffmann’s (WH) classic monograph. One such is acetolysis of the endo chloride (green), which is much much faster than that of the exo isomer (red). The explanation given in their article (p 805) confines itself to succinctly stating that only loss of the endo halogen can be concerted with a required disrotatory ring opening of the cyclopropane.
My previous three posts set out my take on three principle categories of pericyclic reaction. Here I tell a prequel to the understanding of these reactions. In 1965, Woodward and Hoffmann[cite]10.1021/ja01080a054[/cite] in their theoretical analysis (submitted Nov 30, 1964) for which the Nobel prize (to Hoffmann only of the pair, Woodward having died) was later awarded.
In the previous post, I wrote about the processes that might be involved in a molecular wheel rotating. A nano car has four wheels, and surely the most amazing thing is how the wheels manage to move in synchrony. This is one hell of a tough problem, and I do not attempt an answer here, but simply record an odd observation.
The world’s smallest nano car was recently driven a distance of 6nm along a copper track. When I saw this, I thought it might be interesting to go under the hood and try to explain what makes its engine tick and its fuel work. The molecule above represents (I think) the essentials of the engine. Its resting geometry in the S 0 electronic state is shown below. The resting geometry of the engine.
Following on from Armstrong’s almost electronic theory of chemistry in 1887-1890, and Beckmann’s radical idea around the same time that molecules undergoing transformations might do so via a reaction mechanism involving unseen intermediates (in his case, a transient enol of a ketone) I here describe how these concepts underwent further evolution in the early 1920s.
Fascination with nano-objects, molecules which resemble every day devices, is increasing. Thus the world’s smallest car has just been built[cite]10.1038/nature10587[/cite]. The mechanics of such a device can often be understood in terms of chemical concepts taught to most students. So I thought I would have a go at this one!
