
Here at SV-POW! Towers, we have often lamented that so much dinosaur research is locked up behind the paywalls of big for-profit commercial publishers, and that even work that’s been funded by public money is often not available to the public.
Here at SV-POW! Towers, we have often lamented that so much dinosaur research is locked up behind the paywalls of big for-profit commercial publishers, and that even work that’s been funded by public money is often not available to the public.
As often happens here, a comment thread got to be more interesting than the original post and ended up deserving a post of its own. In this case, I’m talking about the thread following the recent Mamenchisaurus tail club post, which got into some interesting territory regarding mass estimates for the largest sauropods.
Most people think of Janensch’s (1950b) plate VIII as being the first skeletal reconstruction of “ Brachiosaurus ” (although Janensch’s species “ Brachiosaurus ” brancai is now referred to the separate genus Giraffatitan ). And it certainly is a classic: {.size-full .wp-image-2616 aria-describedby=“caption-attachment-2616” loading=“lazy” attachment-id=“2616”
Update This is an actual page from the late, lamented Weekly World News, from December 14, 1999. I always thought it was pretty darned funny that they had the alien remains discovered in the “belly” of an animal known only from neck vertebrae.
{.aligncenter .size-full .wp-image-2602 loading=“lazy” attachment-id=“2602” permalink=“http://svpow.com/2010/03/30/mamenchisaurus-tail-club-again/mamenchisaurus-tail-club-from-xing-et-al-2009/” orig-file=“https://svpow.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/mamenchisaurus-tail-club-from-xing-et-al-2009.jpg” orig-size=“744,625” comments-opened=“1”
{.aligncenter .size-full .wp-image-2595 attachment-id=“2595” permalink=“http://svpow.com/2010/03/23/tornieria-caudals/tornieria-caudals/” orig-file=“https://svpow.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/tornieria-caudals.png” orig-size=“2120,1912” comments-opened=“1” image-meta=“{"aperture":"0","credit":"","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":""}”
{.aligncenter .size-full .wp-image-2592 loading=“lazy” attachment-id=“2592” permalink=“http://svpow.com/2010/03/15/um-dude-theres-a-thing-on-your-neck/klamelisaurus-cervicals/” orig-file=“https://svpow.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/klamelisaurus-cervicals.jpg” orig-size=“1034,644” comments-opened=“1”
Shunosaurus lii is a basal eusauropod from the Middle Jurassic of China. Outside of palaeontological circles, it’s not at all well known — which is kind of surprising, as it’s one of the best represented of all sauropods. It’s known from numerous complete skeletons, including skulls, and has been described in detail in Zhang’s (1988) monograph: 89 pages and 15 plates.
{.aligncenter .size-full .wp-image-2566 loading=“lazy” attachment-id=“2566” permalink=“http://svpow.com/2010/03/02/opening-today-snakes-on-a-pod/snakes-on-a-pod/” orig-file=“https://svpow.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/snakes-on-a-pod.jpg” orig-size=“414,615” comments-opened=“1”
The hot news on the block right now is the description of the new sauropod Abydosaurus mcintoshi , which, amazingly, is known from four more or less complete skulls (Chure et al. 2010). This is unheard of — absolutely unprecedented. There are few enough sauropods for which a skull is known at all; but four of them, all in decent nick, is breathtaking.
Lovers of fine sauropods will be well aware that, along with the inadequately described Indian titanosaur Bruhathkayosarus , the other of the truly super-giant sauropods is Amphicoelias fragillimus . Known only from a single neural arch of a dorsal vertebra, which was figured and briefly described by Cope (1878) and almost immediately either lost or destroyed, it’s the classic “one that got away”, the animal that sauropod