I think this isn't supposed to happen, but here's a paper with two DOIs. The first DOI is doi:10.1651/0278-0372(1997)17[253:MPAOTC]2.0.CO;2, which links to a record served by BIOONE.
Playing with the recently released "Catalogue of Life" CD, and pondering Charles Hussey's recent post to TAXACOM about the "European Virtual Library of Taxonomic Literature (E-ViTL)" (part of EDIT) has got me thinking more and more about how primitive our handling of taxonomic literature is, and how it cripples the utility of taxonomic databases such as the Catalogue of Life.
From One Big Library, a nice screencast of why Google's interface works, in contrast to the clunky interfaces favoured by libraries (and databases such as TreeBASE). (If you don't see the video here, visit http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ijLDxgALc2c.)
David Kidd has put together evoviz.org. To quote from the wiki: There is movie demo online at GUBA.
In his post Matthew Cockerill lists three "practical things that Google could do to improve the communication of scientific research", one of which I'd like to highlight: I think this is timely because I've been thinking about citation in the broader sense (e.g., citation networks for GenBank sequences, museum specimens, and taxonomic names). Part of this has come out of thinking about using citation networks to find good phylogenies, but also
E. O. Wilson's wish list has been posted on the TED site, and Donat Agosti has some commentary on biodivcontext. Apparently, even Bill Clinton was outshone.
Donat Agosti has interesting commentary on E. O. Wilson's forthcoming receipt of a TED 2007 prize. In typically forthright fashion, Donat asks: Read his post for Donat's own wish list.
Wired's article How Yahoo Blew It contains this wonderful extract: For some reason, the word really appeals. Not that I've got anything against Yahoo -- far from it. The provide some very cool tools, such as Pipes, which is an interactive feed aggregator and manipulator. David Shorthouse brought this to my attention. As he points out, its highly relevant to our conversation on iSpecies.
Spotted on information aesthetics, IBM's Many Eyes looks very cool. It's a way to share visualisations of data.
In the spirit of "release early, release often", a preliminary version of the TreeBASE name mapping project is now online at TBMap. It's a bit crude, the graphs look awful because they're generated on the fly on a Linux box using GraphViz, but you'll get the idea. I'll try and tidy it up and add a few more visuals to it next week after the EOL Informatics meeting at Woods Hole. There are also some missing mappings to add to the database.
To avoid being charged with being consistent (unlikely, I know), despite being underwhelmed by phylogenetic names in the context of TreeBASE (see conversation with David Marjanović in the previous post), I think they could be very useful in annotating phylogenetic trees.