Just sayin’: {.aligncenter .size-full .wp-image-7333 loading=“lazy” attachment-id=“7333” permalink=“http://svpow.com/2012/12/16/umbaran-starfighter-vs-apatosaurus-cervical-round-3/gallery151/” orig-file=“https://svpow.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/gallery151.jpg” orig-size=“1280,720” comments-opened=“1”
Yesterday, Matt showed you this starship from the Star Wars universe: {.aligncenter .size-full .wp-image-7306 loading=“lazy” attachment-id=“7306” permalink=“http://svpow.com/2012/12/13/was-the-umbaran-starfighter-from-clone-wars-inspired-by-an-apatosaurus-vertebra/umbaranstarfighter-swe/” orig-file=“https://svpow.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/umbaranstarfighter-swe.png” orig-size=“462,482” comments-opened=“1”
[Originally written as a comment on Martin Coward’s blog, but I thought the point was worth making as its own post.] Here’s my take on the widely used Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY) in contrast to more restrictive CC licences such as the Non-Commercial variant (CC BY-NC). It may be true, as Martin suggests, that CC BY-NC is better for the author than CC BY. But authors are part of a community, and it’s unquestionably
{.aligncenter .size-full .wp-image-7306 loading=“lazy” attachment-id=“7306” permalink=“http://svpow.com/2012/12/13/was-the-umbaran-starfighter-from-clone-wars-inspired-by-an-apatosaurus-vertebra/umbaranstarfighter-swe/” orig-file=“https://svpow.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/umbaranstarfighter-swe.png” orig-size=“462,482” comments-opened=“1”
We know that most academic journals and edited volumes ask authors to sign a copyright transfer agreement before proceeding with publication. When this is done, the publisher becomes the owner of the paper; the author may retain some rights according to the grace or otherwise of the publisher. Plenty of authors have rightly railed against this land-grab, which publishers have been quite unable to justify.
It’s an oddity to me that when publishers try to justify their existence with long lists of the valuable services they provide, they usually skip lightly over one of the few really big ones.
A few months ago, Matt and Darren saw a picture someone had done of an Apatosaurus with huge neck-flaps. Since they, they’ve tried to find it again but without success.
There’s been a lot of concern in some corners of the world about the Finch Report’s preference for Gold open access, and the RCUK policy’s similar leaning. Much of the complaining has focussed on the cost of Gold OA publishing: Article Processing Charges (APCs) are very offputting to researchers with limited budgets. I thought it would be useful to provide a page that I (and you) can link to when facing such concerns.
I just saw this tweet from palaeohistologist Sarah Werning, and it summed up what science is all about so well that I wanted to give it wider and more permanent coverage: https://twitter.com/sarahwerning/status/277321783571517442 This is exactly right. Kudos to Sarah for saying it so beautifully.
The problem Its often been noted that under the author-pays model of publication (Gold open access), journals have a financial incentive to publish as many articles as possible so as to collect as many article processing charges as possible.
[Note added in press: Matt published his last post just as I was finishing this one up, so I am posting it without having read his beyond seeing that he also mentions All Yesterdays .] It was back at the Lyme Regis SVPCA in 2011 that I first saw the material that’s now available as the new palaeoart book All Yesterdays [amazon.com, amazon.co.uk]. It was the first talk of the conference, billed as an