Whenever I write a complicated document, such as my submission to the Select Committee on open access, I get Matt to do an editing pass before I finalise it. That’s always worthwhile, but I have to be careful not to just blindly hit the Accept All Changes button.
{.aligncenter .size-full .wp-image-8071 loading=“lazy” attachment-id=“8071” permalink=“http://svpow.com/2013/03/13/giraffes-necks-are-lamentable/supersaurus-vs-giraffe-2/” orig-file=“https://svpow.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/supersaurus-vs-giraffe1.jpeg” orig-size=“1189,880” comments-opened=“1”
For a paper that I and Matt are preparing, we needed to measure the centrum length of a bunch of turkey cervicals. That turns out to be harder than you’d think, because of the curious negative curvature of the articular surfaces.
{.size-large .wp-image-8058 aria-describedby=“caption-attachment-8058” loading=“lazy” attachment-id=“8058” permalink=“http://svpow.com/2013/03/07/the-diamantinasaurus-in-the-cave-definitely-unfamiliar-this-time/enghdiamantinasaurus-colored/” orig-file=“https://svpow.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/enghdiamantinasaurus-colored.jpg” orig-size=“1629,1348” comments-opened=“1”
It turns out that G. K. Chesterton conveniently summarised all of my advice on slide preparation more than a century ago: (Inscribed in the front of a child’s picture book, around 1906.)
Matt and I made a sacred pact not to even think about any new work until we’d got our due-by-the-end-of-March papers done. But then we got chatting, and accidentally started three new projects. Possibly four. And that’s just today. *headdesk* Who knows how many of them will ever see the light of day? Realistically, we are surely going to have to kill some of them if we’re ever going to get anything finished.
{.size-large .wp-image-7920 aria-describedby=“caption-attachment-7920” loading=“lazy” attachment-id=“7920” permalink=“http://svpow.com/2013/03/04/the-sauropod-neck-mass-project-an-experiment-in-open-science/brachiosaurus-sp-byu-12866-c5-with-ct-slices/” orig-file=“https://svpow.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/brachiosaurus-sp-byu-12866-c5-with-ct-slices.png” orig-size=“1600,1000” comments-opened=“1”
{.aligncenter .size-large .wp-image-7986 loading=“lazy” attachment-id=“7986” permalink=“http://svpow.com/2013/03/03/the-recapture-creek-sauropod-the-reveal/recapture-creek-comparo-with-measurements/” orig-file=“https://svpow.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/recapture-creek-comparo-with-measurements.jpg” orig-size=“709,900” comments-opened=“1”
The progressive RCUK policy on open access has recently come under fire, particularly from humanities scholars, for favouring Gold OA over Green.
From Jensen (1987, page 604): “In 1985 I found the proximal third of an extremely large sauropod femur (Figs. 8A, 12A) in a uranium miner’s front yard in southern Utah. The head of this femur is 1.67 m (5’6″) in circumference and was collected from the Recapture Creek Member of the the Morrison Formation in Utah near the Arizona border.
I was reading Stephen Curry’s excellent summary of Monday’s Royal Society’s conference on “Open access in the UK and what it means for scientific research”. One point that Stephen made is: As an analysis of the difficulties of Green OA, this is admirably precise.