{.aligncenter .size-full .wp-image-9252 loading=“lazy” attachment-id=“9252” permalink=“http://svpow.com/2013/11/12/dodos-need-rock-dots/dodo-skull-drawing-mjw-2013/” orig-file=“https://svpow.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/dodo-skull-drawing-mjw-2013.jpg” orig-size=“2350,1440” comments-opened=“1”
I just found out — thanks to a tweet from abertonykus — that this exists: {.aligncenter .size-full .wp-image-9237 loading=“lazy” attachment-id=“9237” permalink=“http://svpow.com/2013/11/10/sv-pow-fan-art-yes-thats-a-thing-now/sauropod_vertebra_picture_adventure__by_classicalguy-d6ssfil/” orig-file=“https://svpow.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/sauropod_vertebra_picture_adventure__by_classicalguy-d6ssfil.jpeg” orig-size=“2025,2767”
One aspect of sauropod neck cartilage that’s been overlooked — and this applies to all non-avian dinosaurs, not just sauropods — is the configuration of the cartilage in their necks. It’s not widely appreciated that birds’ necks differ from those of all other animals in this respect, and we don’t yet know whether sauropods resembled birds or mammals.
Last time, we looked at how including intervertebral cartilage changes the neutral pose of a neck — or, more specifically, of the sequence of cervical vertebrae.
As I mentioned a few days ago, Matt and I have a couple of papers in the new PLOS ONE Sauropod Gigantism collection.
A few bits and pieces about the PLOS Collection on sauropod gigantism that launched yesterday.
This is an exciting day: the new PLOS Collection on sauropod gigantism is published to coincide with the start of this year’s SVP meeting! Like all PLOS papers, the contents are free to the world: free to read and to re-use. (What is a Collection?
It shouldn’t come as a huge surprise to regular readers that PeerJ is Matt’s and my favourite journal. Reasons include its super-fast turnaround, beautiful formatting that doesn’t look like a facsimile of 1980s printed journals, and its responsiveness to authors and readers.
{.aligncenter .size-full .wp-image-9121 loading=“lazy” attachment-id=“9121” permalink=“http://svpow.com/2013/10/17/my-hobby/oh-crap-im-part-furry/” orig-file=“https://svpow.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/oh-crap-im-part-furry.jpg” orig-size=“600,766” comments-opened=“1” image-meta=“{"aperture":"0","credit":"","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":""}”
If the internet has any underlying monomyth, or universally shared common ground, or absolute rule, it is this: People love to see the underdog win. This rule has a corollary: When you try to censor someone, they automatically become the underdog. I say “ try to censor” someone, because on the internet that is remarkably difficult to achieve.
I’m gathering all seven parts of Tutorial 19 (“Open Access definitions and clarifications”) in one place for easy reference. Here they are: Part 1: what actually is Open Access?