[Background: read Stephen Curry’s excellent summary of the new BIS select committee report on Open Access.] Paul Jump’s coverage of open-access issues in Times Higher Education continues with today’s post discussing the fallout from the new BIS report. That report says: There’s your problem, right there.

{.aligncenter .size-full .wp-image-8833 loading=“lazy” attachment-id=“8833” permalink=“http://svpow.com/2013/09/11/beards-of-the-mesozoic-bob-nicholls-edition/apatosaurus1b/” orig-file=“https://svpow.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/apatosaurus1b.jpg” orig-size=“2942,2362” comments-opened=“1”

I just read Mick Watson’s post Why I resigned as PLOS ONE academic editor on his blog [opiniomics](http://biomickwatson.wordpress.com/ “bioinformatics, genomes, biology etc.

You know how every time you point out a problem to legacy publishers — like when they’re caught misrepresenting their open-access offerings they explain that it’s very complicated and will take months to fix? Here’s how that should work: To summarise: I found a bug in the PeerJ system;

{.aligncenter .size-full .wp-image-8344 loading=“lazy” attachment-id=“8344” permalink=“http://svpow.com/2013/09/09/self-study-the-atlas-axis-complex-in-sauropods/omnh-baby-apatosaurus/” orig-file=“https://svpow.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/omnh-baby-apatosaurus.jpg” orig-size=“2272,1704” comments-opened=“1”

We’re just back from SVPCA 2013 in Edinburgh. The first part of the meeting was held at the Royal Society of Edinburgh, but on Friday we moved to the National Museums Scotland. Which is awesome. And free to the public.

{.aligncenter .size-full .wp-image-8818 loading=“lazy” attachment-id=“8818” permalink=“http://svpow.com/2013/09/06/now-this-is-a-man-who-truly-loves-his-sauropod-vertebrae/img_0465/” orig-file=“https://svpow.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/img_0465.jpg” orig-size=“4000,2664” comments-opened=“1” image-meta=“{"aperture":"2.5","credit":"","camera":"Canon PowerShot

Remember at the start of the year, Matt and I had a contest to design a cover for a random book in half an hour?

Back in 2008, Matt and I were at the Museum Für Naturkunde Berlin.

I recently handled the revisions on a paper that hopefully will be in press very soon. One of the review comments was “Be very careful not to make ad hominem attacks”. I was a bit surprised to see that — I wasn’t aware that I’d made any — so I went back over the manuscript, and sure enough, there were no ad hom s in there. There was criticism, though, and I think that’s what the reviewer meant.

I was recently bemoaning the lack of published diplodocid cervical illustrations in dorsal view. Subsequently I mentioned that Upchurch et al. (2005) had illustrated five cervicals of an Apatosaurus specimen. I was overlooking one other paper that contains such an illustration. Which is a bit embarrassing, as it’s one of ours. In fact, it’s our most recent paper, Wedel and Taylor (2013) on sauropod neural spine bifurcation.