Ciências da Computação e da InformaçãoInglêsWordPress.com

The Bibliomagician

The Bibliomagician
Comment & practical guidance from the LIS-Bibliometrics community
Pagina inicialFeed Atom
language
MetricsCiências da Computação e da InformaçãoInglês
Publicados
Autor Bibliomagician Staff

Plan-S based funder Open Access (OA) policies claim that they are process-agnostic, with Green and Gold OA both meeting their requirements, but what proportion of your University’s current publishing outlets are Plan-S compliant via the Green OA route and how easy might the transition to immediate open access be? Lizzie Gadd reports on an investigation at Loughborough University.

BibliometricBibliometricianInterviewResearch EvaluationResponsible MetricsCiências da Computação e da InformaçãoInglês
Publicados
Autor Bibliomagician Staff

An interview with Juan Gorraiz, director of the Bibliometrics and Publications Strategies department at Vienna University Library Nicolas Robinson interviews Juan Gorraiz, who works at Vienna University Library as a professional bibliometrician. Juan is editing a special issue for Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics on best practices in bibliometrics.

Analytical SolutionBibliometric ToolsMetricsResponsible MetricsIncitesCiências da Computação e da InformaçãoInglês
Publicados
Autor Bibliomagician Staff

Robyn Price and Andrew Gray introduce the InCites and SciVal responsible use guides, a new series from the LIS Bibliometric Committee to promote informed use of commercial metrics products. InCites, owned by Clarivate Analytics, and SciVal, owned by Elsevier, are popular commercial analytics subscription tools used by institutions to report on research publication data.

MetricsBetter QuestionsBibliographic DataIg Nobel PrizeInormsCiências da Computação e da InformaçãoInglês
Publicados
Autor Bibliomagician Staff

Lizzie Gadd argues that good research evaluation starts with good questions. The 2019 Ig Nobel Prize winners were announced in September.  Among my favourites was some research into the pleasurability of scratching an itch. Contrary to what the name suggests, winning an Ig Nobel prize is not an indictment of your research design or methods. It’s an indictment of your research question. Is the question a good one?

MetricsDORAInormsLeiden ManifestoMetric TideCiências da Computação e da InformaçãoInglês
Publicados
Autor Bibliomagician Staff

Laura Himanen and Lizzie Gadd introduce a step-by-step process developed by the INORMS Research Evaluation Working Group for evaluating responsibly. We’ve got a shed load of principles now for responsible research metrics. We have DORA, the Leiden Manifesto and the Metric Tide. We also have the many bespoke sets of principles being developed by individual organisations. And they’re great.

Job AdvertJob OpportunityCiências da Computação e da InformaçãoInglês
Publicados
Autor Bibliomagician Staff

Greenwich Research & Enterprise is the University’s central office responsible for developing a supportive research culture and establishing links with industry and enterprise. GRE works across four service areas: research development services, commercialisation and innovation services, research & enterprise training (including postgraduate administration and training) and business support services.

BibliometricBibliometricianField-Weighted ImpactMetricsResponsible MetricsCiências da Computação e da InformaçãoInglês
Publicados
Autor Bibliomagician Staff

Dr Ian Rowlands, writing in a personal capacity Let’s begin with a self-evident truth: publication counts aside, bibliometric indicators often change each time new material is added to a citation database.  That’s a given, but it begs a couple of interesting questions: how much do indicators change, and how quickly?

MetricsSurveyMetrics SurveyCiências da Computação e da InformaçãoInglês
Publicados
Autor Bibliomagician Staff

By Nicolas Robinson Garcia and Lizzie Gadd Since 2015, the LIS-Bibliometrics Committee has run annual Responsible Metrics State-of-the-Art surveys in which we analyse the penetration of responsible metrics awareness and implementation in universities. Every year, the number of participants as well as the number of countries involved has increased, and already last year reported a total of 115 respondents.

MetricsResearch EvaluationResearch FundersData VendorsFundersCiências da Computação e da InformaçãoInglês
Publicados
Autor Bibliomagician Staff

Lizzie Gadd describes how seeing research evaluation as a food chain where participants are both the evaluators and the evaluated may help us understand, and solve, some of the problems inherent within . Research evaluation is often cited as the root cause of many problems facing scholarly communication today. The highest profile problem of course, being evaluation-by-journal-brand as the cause of journal-brand-obsession.

Bibliometric ToolsEquality And DiversityMetricsResearch AssesmentResearch EvaluationCiências da Computação e da InformaçãoInglês
Publicados
Autor Bibliomagician Staff

A Panel from the 2019 American Library Association Annual Conference in Washington D.C. Monica Ihli, Librarian and Liaison to Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Data Science, and Energy Science at the University of Tennessee, summarizes the discussion A speaker panel assembled on Saturday, June 22nd 2019 at the 2019 American Library Association Annual Conference, to address and promote dialogue about the barriers to