Yesterday, we looked at (mostly) the humerus of the Wealden sauropod “ Pelorosaurus ” becklesii , which you will recall is known from humerus, radius, ulna and a skin impression, and — whatever it might be — is certainly not a species of Pelorosaurus . Now let’s look at the radius and ulna.
It’s an oddity that in eight years of SV-POW!, we’ve never written about one of the best of all the Wealden-formation sauropod specimens: the forelimb and associated skin impression NHMUK R1870 that is known as “ Pelorosaurus ” becklesii . Let’s fix that.
[I am using the term “megajournal” here to mean “journal that practices PLOS ONE -style peer-review for correctness only, ignoring guesses at possible impact”. It’s not a great term for this class of journals, but it seems to be becoming established as the default.] Bo-Christer Björk’s (2015) new paper in PeerJ asks the question “Have the “mega-journals” reached the limits to growth?”, and suggests that the answer may be yes.
Provoked by Mike Eisen’s post today, The inevitable failure of parasitic green open access, I want to briefly lay out the possible futures of scholarly publishing as I see them.
A couple of months ago, Darren (the silent partner in the SV-POW!
Somehow this seems to have slipped under the radar: National Science Foundation announces plan for comprehensive public access to research results. They put it up on 18 March, two whole months ago, so our apologies for not having said anything until now! This is the NSF’s rather belated response to the OSTP memo on Open Access, back in January 2013.
Matt drew my attention to an old paper I’d not seen before: Riggs (1903) on the vertebral column of Brontosaurus . The page I linked there shows only the first page (which in fact is half a page, since Riggs’ work is only in the right column). Why only the first page? As Matt put it, “It’s been 110 years, just give us the PDF already.
{.aligncenter .size-full .wp-image-11950 loading=“lazy” attachment-id=“11950” permalink=“http://svpow.com/2015/05/14/two-important-new-palaeobiological-hypotheses-regarding-diplodocids/fat-necked-apatosaurs-make-the-world-go-round/” orig-file=“https://svpow.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/fat-necked-apatosaurs-make-the-world-go-round.jpeg” orig-size=“1754,2113” comments-opened=“1”
{.size-large .wp-image-11937 .aligncenter loading=“lazy” attachment-id=“11937” permalink=“http://svpow.com/2015/05/13/the-scale-model-of-the-amnh-apatosaurine-skeleton-amnh-460/amnh-460-skeleton-model-2/” orig-file=“https://svpow.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/amnh-460-skeleton-model-2.jpg” orig-size=“2272,1113” comments-opened=“1”
In response to my post Copyright from the lens of reality and other rebuttals of his original post, Elseviers General Counsel Mark Seeley has provided a lengthy comment. Here’s my response (also posted as a comment on the original article, but I’m waiting for it to be moderated.) Hi, Mark, thanks for engaging. You write: Here, at least, we are in complete agreement.
{.size-large .wp-image-11929 .aligncenter loading=“lazy” attachment-id=“11929” permalink=“http://svpow.com/2015/05/09/what-should-we-tell-people-about-the-amnh-apatosaurine/amnh-460-left-anterolateral-view/” orig-file=“https://svpow.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/amnh-460-left-anterolateral-view.jpg” orig-size=“2737,1662” comments-opened=“1”