Copied from an email exchange. Mike: Did we know about the Royal Society’s PLOS ONE-clone? http://rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org/about I am in favour of this. I might well send them my next paper while the universal waiver is still in place. Matt: Did not know about it. Their post-waiver APC is insane. How can they possibly justify $1600?

The REF (Research Excellence Framework) is a time-consuming exercise that UK universities have to go through every few years to assess and demonstrate the value of their research to the government; the way funding is allocated between universities is largely dependent on the results of the REF. The exercise is widely resented, in part because the processes of preparing and reviewing the submissions are so time-consuming.

I’m at the Royal Society today and tomorrow as part of the Future of Scholarly Scientific Communication conference. Here’s the programme. I’m making some notes for my own benefit, and I thought I might as well do them in the form of a blog-post, which I will continuously update, in case anyone else is interested.

{.aligncenter .wp-image-11688 .size-large loading=“lazy” attachment-id=“11688” permalink=“http://svpow.com/2015/04/17/tutorial-4b-saurischian-vertebral-laminae-and-fossae-redux-by-adam-marsh/saurischian-laminae-and-fossae-v2-adam-marsh-2015/” orig-file=“https://svpow.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/saurischian-laminae-and-fossae-v2-adam-marsh-2015.png” orig-size=“4590,6258” comments-opened=“1”

A couple of weeks ago, Mike sent me a link to this interview with ecologist James O’Hanlon, who made this poster (borrowed from this post on O’Hanlon’s blog): {.size-large .wp-image-11671 .aligncenter loading=“lazy” attachment-id=“11671” permalink=“http://svpow.com/2015/04/13/how-conveniently-can-you-package-your-results/ohanlon-et-al-isbeposter/” orig-file=“https://svpow.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/ohanlon-et-al-isbeposter.jpg”

{.size-large .wp-image-11664 aria-describedby=“caption-attachment-11664” loading=“lazy” attachment-id=“11664” permalink=“http://svpow.com/2015/04/07/welcome-back-brontosaurus-and-other-first-thoughts-on-tschopp-et-al-2015/yale-brontosaurus-1/” orig-file=“https://svpow.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/yale-brontosaurus-1.jpg” orig-size=“1704,2272” comments-opened=“1”

This abomination — a proposal for a “UK National Licence” for open-access papers, making them available only in the UK, is not an April Fool joke.

There’s been some concern over Scientific Reports ’ new scheme whereby authors submitting manuscripts can pay $750 to have them peer-reviewed more quickly. Some members of the editorial board have quit over this development, feeling that it’s unfair to authors who can’t pay. Myself, I feel it at least shows admirable audacity — NPG has found a way to monetise its own lethargy, which is surely what capitalism is all about.

I had an email out of the blue this morning, from someone I’d not previously corresponded with, asking me an important question about PeerJ. I thought it was worth sharing the question, and its answer, more generally.

{.alignnone .size-large .wp-image-11632 loading=“lazy” attachment-id=“11632” permalink=“http://svpow.com/2015/03/22/baby-box-turtles-and-the-ghost-of-editors-past/baby-box-turtles-2015-03-21-3/” orig-file=“https://svpow.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/baby-box-turtles-2015-03-21-3.jpg” orig-size=“1200,1600” comments-opened=“1”

{.wp-image-11604 .size-large aria-describedby=“caption-attachment-11604” loading=“lazy” attachment-id=“11604” permalink=“http://svpow.com/2015/03/17/you-can-predict-how-rabbits-run-by-looking-at-their-skulls/kraatz-et-al-2015-figure-1-rabbit-skull-freak-gallery/” orig-file=“https://svpow.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/kraatz-et-al-2015-figure-1-rabbit-skull-freak-gallery.png” orig-size=“3000,2181” comments-opened=“1”