Biyolojik BilimlerİngilizceWordPress

bjoern.brembs.blog

The blog of neurobiologist Björn Brembs
Ana SayfaAtom Besleme
language
Own DataPosterSfNBiyolojik Bilimlerİngilizce
Yayınlandı

It’s the time of the year again where 30,000 neuroscientists head to the US to talk neuroscience. This year the big annual conference is in Washington, DC, one of the three cities able to host this large event. Our first poster will be up on Tuesday morning and shows results from operant self-stimulation experiments using optogenetics and dopaminergic neurons.

Science PoliticsDEALElsevierInfrastructureTransformative AgreementsBiyolojik Bilimlerİngilizce
Yayınlandı

No matter how well-intended (and we all know to which place the road leads that is paved with good intentions!), transformative agreements (such as DEAL in Germany) are generally the wrong tool at the wrong time for making publicly funded science accessible to the public.

Science PoliticsPlan SSmitsBiyolojik Bilimlerİngilizce
Yayınlandı

Jeffrey “predatory journals” Beall famously catapulted himself out of any serious debate with an article in the journal TripleC, entitled “The Open-Access Movement is Not Really about Open Access“. In it, Beall claimed that OA proponents don’t care about access, but that they form an “anti-corporatist movement that wants to deny the freedom of the press to companies it disagrees with”. The article is so replete with similarly unhinged fairy

Science PoliticsCouncil Of The EUInfrastructurePublishersBiyolojik Bilimlerİngilizce
Yayınlandı

On May 23, the Council of the EU adopted a set of conclusions on scholarly publishing that, if followed through, would spell the end for academic publishers and scholarly journals as we know them. On the same day, the adoption was followed by a joint statement of support by the largest and most influential research organizations in Europe.

Science PoliticsElsevierPredatory PublishingPublishersTrustBiyolojik Bilimlerİngilizce
Yayınlandı

Data broker RELX is represented on Twitter by their Chief Communications Officer Paul Abrahams. Due to RELX subsidiary Elsevier being one of the largest publishers of academic journals, Dr. Abrahams frequently engages with academics on the social media platform.

Science PoliticsPeer-reviewPublishingBiyolojik Bilimlerİngilizce
Yayınlandı

There are those who demand journal peer-review be paid extra on top of academic salaries. Let’s have a look at the financials of that proposal. The article linked above confirms common rates of academic consulting fees, i.e., anything between US$100 per hour for graduate students and US$350 per hour for faculty. Taking a conservative US$200 as an easy, lower-bound estimate for, say, a post-doc hour seems to cover most cases.

Science PoliticsElsevierLobbyingOpen ScienceParasitesBiyolojik Bilimlerİngilizce
Yayınlandı

Or let’s think a a few sizes smaller and imagine a renowned pulmonologist taking the, say, “Marlboro Endowed Chair” in the Mayo Clinic’s Pulmonary Medicine Division, sponsored by Philip Morris. What would they have to endure and how much credibility would they and the institutions lose? Undoubtedly, the foul stench of corruption and hypocrisy would be difficult to counter.

Own DataaPKCDrosophilaFoxPHabit FormationBiyolojik Bilimlerİngilizce
Yayınlandı

I just sent the poster for this year’s Society for Neuroscience meeting to the printer. As our graduate student is preparing his defense and our postdoc did not get a visa (no thanks, US!), we just have a single poster this year and I will present it myself on Monday, November 14, 2022, 8:00 AM – 12:00 PM, on poster board WW53.

Science PoliticsAPCsAuthorsIncentivesPublic FundsBiyolojik Bilimlerİngilizce
Yayınlandı

Wikipedia defines ‘embezzlement‘ as “the act of withholding assets for the purpose of conversion of such assets”. Google defines it as “misappropriation of funds placed in one’s trust”: If one takes the position that researchers at public institutions are entrusted with public funds to spend on research in the public interest, then researchers spending public funds on something that mainly benefits them personally rather than the

Science PoliticsDiscourseOnlinePost-factual SciencePost-truthBiyolojik Bilimlerİngilizce
Yayınlandı

Reading the reactionary defense of the digital stone age in AAAS’ flagship magazine Science , I felt reminded of the now infamous “Make American Science Great Again” letter to Trump and all the other public statements by scholarly societies over the last 30 years on how this internet thing is a threat to their revenue and hence must be opposed.