Sigh. More hacking attempts and seems someone did manage to inject a php eval attack into one of my Wordpress installs.

In a recent [piece for The Bookseller](http://www.thebookseller.com/blogs/anthony-cond-309360), Anthony Cond (for whom I have a huge deal of respect), writes approvingly, if cautiously, of the births of new university presses. Indeed, there is much to celebrate in the idea of the university taking back the means of its research production on a not-for-profit basis. I am wholly in support of such a mission.

Everyone, when they are writing, can find themselves falling into bad habits. This is because, as my friend Liz Sage pointed out to me, when you are writing, you're trying to express thought. It's a writerly activity for you, the author, not thinking wholly of the reader. Examples of things that I do include repeating the same word in a sentence and using split infinitives.

Over the past week I've done some of the initial development work on [CaSSius](https://github.com/MartinPaulEve/CaSSius), the portion of the typesetter for the [Open Library of Humanities](https://www.openlibhums.org) that produces PDF output. The idea here is that, as a publisher, you want to produce one document and then create HTML and PDF from that single source. CaSSius provides two ways to achieve this.

 Announcing [CaSSius](https://github.com/MartinPaulEve/CaSSius): a tool to create beautiful paginated PDF documents from HTML content using CSS regions. It is intended to be part of [XML-first/XML-in workflows](https://www.martineve.com/2015/07/20/building-a-real-xml-first-workflow-for-scholarly-typesetting/) for scholarly communications but may have alternative uses.

For some time now, I've worked to build an open-source JATS XML typesetter. It's called [meTypeset](https://github.com/MartinPaulEve/meTypeset). It's not by any means perfect and the approach it takes is unlikely to ever yield 100% good markup from Word input.

In the past couple of weeks I've had a number of emails about the styleguide for the [Open Library of Humanities](https://www.openlibhums.org). Queries range from "my discipline does things differently, is that OK?" to "why bother maintaining your own style guide, why not just refer to a named style like Chicago?" Both good points. My own thinking actually goes further, though.

The following is the slightly revised text of my keynote at the _Action Writing: The Politics of US Literature, 1960-Present_, held at Birkbeck College, University of London on the 3rd July 2015, organized by Catherine Flay and Pippa Eldridge.

If you think carefully about research publication and its economics, a strange (but also obvious) point becomes clear. In university ecosystems where we have tuition fees (and probably in those without) we determine how much material can be published through the frame of reference of teaching. This can be seen if you accept that research in the academy serves the dual function of dissemination _and_ assessment.

Some thoughts... What can it mean to think of David Mitchell's _Cloud Atlas_ as a conservative text? Its author, certainly, does not come across as a political Conservative and is more likely to grace the pages of the _Guardian_ than the _Daily Mail_. Mitchell is also no backwards-looking Luddite;

A quick post to help anyone else, as I couldn't find this info easily on the web. In the middle of the night, I was awoken by my Nexus 6 announcing an "Incoming call from unknown number", despite the fact I had priority mode on and it shouldn't have said anything.