¿Quieres hacer tu servicio social en línea trabajando con información, datos o literatura científica digital y hacer procesamiento, análisis o visualización para la investigación y la enseñanza de las biociencias?Ya está abierta la convocatoria para todos aquellos estudiantes interesados en realizar su servicio social en el Laboratorio de Bioinformación, de apoyo a la investigación tipo formativo y profesionalizante para los

Vale la pena recordar que sí queremos que los estudiantes generen trabajos con información de calidad, con citas y referencias adecuadas usando un estilo bibliográfico es indispensable hacerlo nosotros en todas las oportunidades posibles, mediante el hábito de verla, irán asimilando la importancia de la publicación académica y científica, así como el papel de las herramientas para utilizarla pertinentemente.

The Authors Guild (USA) launched its Human Authored Certification program (29 January 2025). This certification permits its members to register their written works with the Guild as having been created by a human rather than something produced by artificial intelligence (AI). These are some first thoughts I had when reading about the program and reflecting on initiatives with similar goals.

Der Zugang zu Wissen, Information und Kultur ist ein elementares Gut moderner Wissensgesellschaften. Ein neuer Leitfaden von Till Kreutzer unterstützt dabei, die richtige Creative-Commons-Lizenz zu wählen und Inhalte auf diese Weise rechtssicher zu teilen. Der Leitfaden entstand in Kooperation mit Wikimedia Deutschland und der Deutschen UNESCO-Kommission. Der Leitfaden „Open Content.

January is a strange month. After the festive whirl of December’s gatherings, it quickly shifts into the hustle and bustle of the new year’s commitments and the work that follows the holidays. For us at OpenCitations, however, it has become a tradition to take a moment at the end of this month to pause after the first hectic weeks of the year.

Thou shalt not suffer a flaky test to live, because it’s annoying, counterproductive, and dangerous: one day it might fail for real, and you won’t notice. Here’s what to do.

(please cite this post as https://doi.org/10.59350/nxkfm-ghk92) Today many researchers are not only capturing new knowledge in papers; they are also creating elements of infrastructure, such as datasets, software, and services. However, traditional methods of support and evaluation haven’t made a concomitant change.

This week we are pleased to announce and highlight new updated additions to our long-running collaboration with protocols.io, linked to our first paper with a peer-reviewed protocol featuring a “Peer-reviewed method” badge on protocols.io. Alongside the addition of new functionality in protocols.io to submit protocols as method papers to GigaByte . The new GigaByte paper presents a new method expanding the alphabet and

( Klik hier om de Nederlandse versie te lezen ) In any evaluation of scientific research, the obvious question is: how does a research unit compare with others, nationally and internationally? This question is easier to ask than to answer, because the answer is not easy to substantiate.

( To read the English version, click here ) Bij iedere evaluatie van wetenschappelijk onderzoek ligt de vraag voor de hand: hoe presteert een onderzoekseenheid in vergelijking met anderen, nationaal en internationaal? Die vraag is makkelijker gesteld dan beantwoord, want een antwoord laat zich niet gemakkelijk onderbouwen.

Surprising insights into wildlife populations revealed by the pellet count method – a cost-effective approach for estimating species abundance and habitat use.