Informática y Ciencias de la InformaciónInglésBlogger

iPhylo

Rants, raves (and occasionally considered opinions) on phyloinformatics, taxonomy, and biodiversity informatics. For more ranty and less considered opinions, see my Twitter feed.ISSN 2051-8188. Written content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
Página de inicioFeed AtomMastodonISSN 2051-8188
language
Informática y Ciencias de la InformaciónInglés
Publicado

The November 2006 issue of D-Lib magazine contains an article by Elaine Peterson entitled "Beneath the Metadata: Some Philosophical Problems with Folksonomy" (doi:10.1045/november2006-peterson). She writes: This article is one of the most irritating things I've read in a while, and as much as I like philosophy, it reinforces my prejudice that invoking philosophy is almost always a bad idea.

Informática y Ciencias de la InformaciónInglés
Publicado

As noted on the Society of Systematic Biology (SSB) web site, the journal Phyloinformatics has disappeared. It only published eight papers, but this still represents lost effort, and some of the papers are highly relevant to issues I'm interested in. Luckily, with the help of the Internet Archive's "wayback machine", and a PDF sent by Paul Sereno, I've put all the PDFs on the SSB web site. You can get them here.

Informática y Ciencias de la InformaciónInglés
Publicado

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution carries two articles debating the application of names to trees, which reflects tensions between two codes of nomenclatures (ICZN and Phylocode). Alain Dubois (doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2006.06.007 and David Hillis (doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2006.08.001) present rather different views.

Informática y Ciencias de la InformaciónInglés
Publicado

Just wanted to write this example down before I loose it. Browsing Bill Piel's trees in Google Earth, and was looking at Lee et al.'s paper (doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02707.x) on Physalaemus pustulosus . Searching in iSpecies.org lead to records in GenBank, whereupon I stumble on the fact that in GenBank it is Engystomops pustulosus (Taxonomy ID: 76066). Following up the reference on the NCBI taxonomy page, I find a PDF of

Informática y Ciencias de la InformaciónInglés
Publicado

Stumbled across New Infrastructures for Knowledge Production: Understanding E-science while writing about TAXACOM on the iSpecies blog. The book is edited by Christine Hine, who has an article entitled The politics and practice of accessibility in systematics, which I think will be part of Past, Present & Future of Research in the Information Society.

Informática y Ciencias de la InformaciónInglés
Publicado

I've previously bemoaned the lack of a decent way to display and navigate through phylogenies. Ryen White, a graduate of Glasgow's Computer Science department and now at Microsoft Research is coauthor of of cool paper on viewing large trees in small spaces.

Informática y Ciencias de la InformaciónInglés
Publicado

EditGrid is an online collaborative spreadsheet tool that I stumbled across via Ogle Earth. It strikes me thjat this could be a way to create phylogenetic data sets collaboratively. As a quick test I grabbed the Vertebrates example file that comes with MacClade, exported the NEXUS file as a table, opened it in Excel, then uploaded the Excel file to EditGrid. You can see the results here.

Informática y Ciencias de la InformaciónInglés
Publicado

One of my (forever) ongoing projects is to map taxon names in TreeBASE to names in external databases (such as uBio) as a way of checking that the names are correct, adding the ability to handle synonyms, and hierarchical queries (see my earlier post for more details). Now, many names in TreeBASE aren't in any of the major name databases (fossils seem particularly poorly supported), which means hunting on Google for the name.

Informática y Ciencias de la InformaciónInglés
Publicado

Just finished reading Small Pieces Loosely Joined. It's a fabulous essay on the nature of the Web. The more I read it the more it confirms my fear that most people talking about biological taxonomy and biodiversity on the Web simply don't "get" the Web. Adopting the Web successfully will require a willingness to accept error, ambiguity, and downplaying "expertise" and "authority". It will be interesting to see what happens.