For a long time, there were just two main citation sources that had data that could claim to be relatively comprehensive multi-discipline wise, namely Web of Science and Scopus.

Where I speculate about how the concepts of skill caps and performance caps and the views that librarians implictly hold on them in these two dimensions, affect how they engage with them.

In this week's blog entry, I cover three new stories of interest that have one common thread - issues affecting the measurement of journal usage.

It has been over 2 years ago in Jun 2017, where I picked up on the growing trend of library discovery services and Abstract and indexing servicing intergrating open access content into their indexes.

Updated 27/8/2019 - Libkey Nomad now supports open access via Unpaywall (accepted manuscript) on top of full OA journals already in Libkey Knowledgebase. Kopernio now allows institutions which are WOS customers to setup library link resolver as a fall-back.

Back in 2016, I wrote a fairly controversial piece wondering "Are institutional repositories a dead end?" .

In 2018, I started noticing an increasing number of startups that focused on applying machine learning in the Libraries and Scholarly Communication arena.

In academia, the print paradigm still holds sway. For instance, I've argued that our citation practices makes no sense in our largely digital era. That said, quite a bit of the content, we read, cite and use are available only in hard copy , or failing that content in PDF that can't be easily manipulated in digital formats.

It has been over a year in April 2018 since I had the opportunity to present at two panels in conferences alongside experts such as Lisa Hinchliffe, Johan Tilstra (Founder Lean Library), Jason Priem (Cofounder Unpaywall), Ben Kaube (Cofounder Kopernio

The news that University of California system cancelled their deal with Elsevier seemed to have caused a bit of a stir all over the world, including here in Singapore and I was asked to do a talk to brief faculty on the latest trends in this area.

Most people agree with Open Access is a good thing to have, but a lot of the debate resolves over business models and the cost we should pay for it.