Historical note : This was written before the launch of APA 7. Some of the specific examples about APA 6 like the need to add place of publication no longer hold for APA 7, but the general arguments in this essay do not hinge on any specifics. People outside academia are often struck by how odd things are in academia.

I was recently invited to the OCLC Asia Pacific Regional Conference Meeting 2018 in Bangkok to speak. The conference had the theme "Game Changer" and I gave my thoughts on how I see the game changing for libraries in the years to come. For the past 2-3 years, I have been blogging on various trends and technologies like  analytics, open citations, open data, linked data,

I expect that most readers of this blog are familar with  Lorcan Dempsey's idea of distinguishing between  "outside-in" vs "inside-out" activities for libraries.  I have argued that with open access gaining ground, the traditional role of academic librarians where they own or acquire access to books and journal articles for their community (the outside-in approach) is likely to decline in importance.

null

It's not big secret that Machine learning and AI is an increasingly important topic to study. But I was again reminded of this again when I recently attended a talk on Microsoft Academic , entitled "What Can We Expect from Machine Cognition " The talk began simply enough, recapping some of the latest triumphs by AI in conquering games like Go and Video games like DOTA, Pacman.

As the battle for open access , or more accurately the route taken to open access rages on, I have become aware of the rise of a new type of "open" - the quest for "open infrastructure". My understanding of it is very limited, but I first seriously took note of it when I saw people tweeting about the Joint Roadmap for Open Science Tools (JROST). One of the reasons why open access is in such a mess is because we have given up the

I have been recently thinking about dataset discovery, most recently on the possible impact of Google Dataset search.  One of the areas I've been investigating is the linkage between the article and the associate dataset. In particular, one of the more eye catching areas where this link appears is in Scopus, where there is a "related research data" link section.

It seems like just a short time last year in May where I blogged about the new iteration of Microsoft's academic search dubbed "Microsoft Academic" which was then in beta and it eventually left beta at the end of the year. But it seems they are at it again, this time there is a Microsoft Academic Preview. On first glance this looks just like a run of mill face lift. Don't get me wrong, overall I think this is an improvement.

I’ve recently come across an idea known as inversion.

It has been a very eventful couple of weeks in the academic, publisher and library related worlds with regards to the push towards open.

Update Aug 2020 - The main thrust of this response is to point out RA21 type solutions do not handle the appropriate copy problem.