I recently finished reading two introductory volumes on Open Access, namely Open Access - What you need to know by Walt Crawford and Open Access by Peter Suber. As far as I remember, I have never done a book review on this blog before, so here is my review of both. But first a little context of where I am coming from.

I was talking to a couple of students from my university in a online chatroom* and one mentioned that he was doing his literature review for his final year thesis**. Of course, I asked out of professional curiosity how he was doing it, and he mentioned he just used Google Scholar.

I am sure most of you have heard of Google Now available on Android Jellybean it is not just a intelligent personal agent like Siri that answers voice queries but more impressively there is a "predictive" component that can intelligently display content that Google thinks you will need before asking for it. Here's the promise "Google Now gets you just the right information at just the right time.

It's the end of the year, and perhaps it's time to take stock of what went right and what to work on the next year.

I have been studying, thinking and posting about web scale discovery since 2011 and my institution is currently days away from pushing it out as a default search. In many ways, this has been one of the most technically challenging library projects I have been involved so far due to its far reaching effects, affecting everything from IT, cataloguing, e-resource management and information literacy.

There's a fascinating discussion going on now (Nov 2012) at the NGC4LIB (Next generation catalogs for libraries) Listserv about the value of cataloguing, RDF, Linked data etc. First the thread, "Authority in an Age of Open Access" links to a talk given by Clay Shirkey  and there is a brief interesting discussion about how the Smithsonian Institution crowdsourced tags for photos on flickr on the list.

Hi all, this is yet another conference report from me, my 3rd and last international conference for 2012. This time around, I had the opportunity to attend and speak at Internet Librarian International 2012 in London. I was very excited to attend because I knew from looking at the tweets and slides coming out from the past editions, this was my type of conference & I wasn't disappointed.

This is probably the final part of my mammoth series of posts analysing Summon libraries. To recap. In June, I used Libwebcats to extract about 200+ libraries that self-identified to be using Summon. Then I analysed in the following blog posts 1) How they were branding the service 2) How they were designing the Summon box and also how many were using single box vs multi-tab/box or no box at all.

This is part II of How are libraries designing their search boxes?  A quick recap, in June 2012, I used  Library Technology Guides Libwebcats , did an advanced search (free registration needed) for libraries  using Summon and went to their websites to study various characteristics including how they brand the Summon Service and how they designed their search boxes.

I am sure you have seen presentation slides done in the libraryland by speakers that are often stunning in simplicity. You know the type - one picture as the background with at most 2 lines of text. Of course, anyone of us could mimic this but for 2 things 1) It takes work and time to look up for suitable pictures. create text boxes to enter text etc 2) Our natural inclination is to fill up the slides with lots of words.

I am hardly a expert on usability or user experience but over time of looking at usage logs and talking to users, observing users by walking around and helping I have started to realise a couple of things. Here's one.